Worst current-gen game you've played?

Turok (X360) takes the cake for me.

Terribad controls, horrible story, jagged edges all over the place, dinosaurs that weren't even fun to kill.

You think, "Dude, I can slay a fucking T-Rex? This game will be the bee's knees!"

But no, fuck you, it's most certainly not.

Well they pretty much all suck.

LSL Box office bust....

that shit went to selling 5 bucks new in a week

Darkest of Days

it was a pretty weird game, you time travel to different eras, (civil war, ww1, civil war AGAIN, ww1 AGAIN, ww2 (you are in a prison camp and you have to escape), then Mt. Vesueveus (or however you spell it)) and you look for certain people, it sounds fun, but the voice acting is horrible, the controls pissed me off multiple times, the story....there barely is one, you start fighting at General Custer's last stand (or whatever it is), then you get hit by an arrow, a guy in a big metallic, space-like suit comes out of a blue plasma like shield and takes you to a base, then you go to the different eras looking for people). i never did beat it, i got to the last level and stopped because: 1. it was too hard, died every five seconds, tried multiple paths, and 2. it got boring after dying to many times.

so, yeah......

Legendary.
Reopen Pandora's box, fight mythical monsters thinking "This is gonna be great!"
However, the graphics are horrible along with the voice acting. You fight an astounding 5 monsters with a jawdropping 7 weapons. Horrible.

mw2

^haha, agreed

DeadApe wrote:Fallout 3.

is that the game that was better than Oblivion, idk i think it was.

But, Godfather 2 for me, it wasn't worth a free.

DeadApe wrote:

MagicMan313 wrote:

DeadApe wrote:Fallout 3.

is that the game that was better than Oblivion, idk i think it was.

Sorry sir, you are mistaken.

Dead ape how can you say this is not fun at all.

Oh c'mon, Fallout 3 wasn't that bad. As an old Fallout and Resident Evil fan, I think Fallout 3 did the same thing Resident Evil 4 did. Flipped everything upside down and raped the series' old games... Only difference is, Fallout 3 was still a good game after doing so. Nowhere near as good as 1 & 2, but at least worth playing.

Made in Finland wrote:Oh c'mon, Fallout 3 wasn't that bad. As an old Fallout and Resident Evil fan, I think Fallout 3 did the same thing Resident Evil 4 did. Flipped everything upside down and raped the series' old games... Only difference is, Fallout 3 was still a good game after doing so. Nowhere near as good as 1 & 2, but at least worth playing.

truly, it was good in the sense that they tried something new with the fallout series and it worked for the most part. The downs, it completely copy and pasted the oblivion engine (still though, made by the the same studio) and did have a lack of weapons and items. HOWEVER, too many people bought the game without any prior knowledge of the fallout series and ended up complaining about the amazing storyline when they didn't know jack shit.

Anyway, my worst gen game was probably need for speed undercover (exact copy of most wanted) and MW2

i disagree, i think fallout 3 was far better than the first two, and resident evil 4 was far better than the first three. I mean what did you like most about resident evil 1, 2, or 3. Was it the horrible writing. the god awful camera, or the so easy a 5 year old could solve puzzles. I mean, yea there not zombies anymore in resident evil 4 but so what, i rather have them switch it up a little than run in into the ground, like some games. (cough....Halo.....cough)

you guys could say MW2 in the multiplayer aspect but theres no denying the greatness in the story is there??